http://mlbboards.com News & Information: Minor Irrigation --- Drip Irrigation Part 3 --- www.nabard.org

Minor Irrigation --- Drip Irrigation Part 3 --- www.nabard.org

Minor Irrigation

Drip Irrigation: Part 3

4.0  LAYOUT OF DRIP SYSTEM

The main Line in a drip system should follow land contour as closely as possible. If there is a slope, should be made for pressure differences due to change in elevation. A fall of 1 m in elevation is equivalent to an increase in pressure of about 0.1 atmosphere. Where main lines are laid down on a slope, the increase in pressure due to elevation change may partly compensate the friction head loss. To provide nearly uniform pressure at each emitter, the tubing should be of sufficient diameter to avoid excess friction losses. The water delivered in the supply line is released through emitters spaced along the supply line. The total friction head loss due to lateral openings can be calculated by multiplying the head loss over the total length by a Reduction Co-efficient given in Table 6. However, the additional head loss on account of diversion of flow from the main/laterals into the emitters has to be separately added while estimating the total head for purpose of calculating hp of the pump set. Friction head loss for various flow rates in plastic tubing of different sizes are given in Table 7.

The allowable pressure drop in mainline and laterals depend upon the operating pressure required at emitters. The pressure difference between the proximate and distant point along the supply line should not exceed 20% which will keep the variation of discharge within 10% of its value at the first emitter.

Table - 6 Reduction Co-efficient 'F' for Multiple Outlet Pipeline Friction Loss Co-efficient
 
No.of outlets
F
No of outlets
F
1
1
8
0.42
2
0.65
10 to 11
0.41
3
0.55
12 to 15
'0.40
4
'0.50
16 to 20
0.39
5
0.47
21 to 30
0.38
6
0.45
21 to 37
0.37
7
0.44
38 to 70
0.36
 
Table - 7 Friction Head Loss in Meters per 100 m. Pipe Length
 

Flow
(lph)
Inside diameter (mm)
9.2
11.7
12.7
13.9
15.8
'18.0
'19.0
Head loss in meters per 100 m length of pipe
200
10.2
5.2
2.5
1.7
0.8
0.4
0.3
400
'39.0
'18.0
8.6
5.7
2.7
1.6
1.1
600
--
'39.0
'18.0
'13.0
5.9
3.2
2.5
800
--
--
'30.0
'21.0
'10.0
5.5
4.1
1,000
--
--
'45.0
'30.0
16
8.3
6.2
1,200
--
--
--
'42.0
'21.0
'11.0
8.8
1,400
--
--
--
'56.0
'28.0
'16.0
'11.0
1,600
--
--
--
--
'36.0
'20.0
'15.0
1,800
--
--
--
--
'45.0
25
'19.0
2,000
--
--
--
--
'54.0
'30.0
'23.0
 
4.1 Mainline

To design the main line, the pressure required at proximate end of laterals and the maximum friction loss at that point should first be determined. Friction losses due to valves, risers, connectors, etc., should be added to this. Sometimes, two or more laterals simultaneously operate from the mainline and these have to be properly accounted for in the design.
The friction head loss in mains can be estimated by Hazen-Williams formula is given bellow.

hf = 10.68x(Q/C) xD x(L+Le)

Where : hf = Friction head loss in pipe (m)

Q = Discharge (M /sec)
C = Hazen Willian constant (140 for PVC pipe)
D = Inner dia of pipe (m)
L = Length of Pipe (m)
Le = Equivalent length of pipe and accessories

4.2 Laterals
The design of lateral pipe involves selection of required pipe size for a given length to meet the required quantity of water to the plant. This is the most important component of the system as large amount of pipe per unit of land is required and the pipe cost is such that system is economically viable.
In designing the lateral, the discharge and operating pressure at emitters are required to be known and accordingly, the allowable head can be determined by the same formula as the main line.

4.3 Design Criteria
The pressure head of emitter of any lateral should be calculated based on discharge requirement of each emitter.
  1. It should be ensured that the head loss in the lateral length between the first and last emitter is within 10% of the head available at the first emitter.
  2. The friction head loss in the mainline should not exceed 1m/100m length of the mainline.
Friction head loss for various discharges is given in table 8 and equivalent lengths of straight pipe in meters giving equivalent resistance to flow in pipe fittings in Table 9.
 
Table-8 : Friction Losses for Flow of Water (m/100m) in smooth Pipes(c=140)
 
Discharge
(lps)
Bore diameter (mm)
20
25
32
40
50
65
80
100
125
150
0.5
16.4
5.5
1.6
0.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
10
6
2
0.68
-
-
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
12.7
4.3
1.45
0.4
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
16
7.3
2.5
0.68
0.25
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
15.5
5.2
1.45
0.53
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
26.4
6.9
2.5
0.9
0.3
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
13.4
3.8
1.36
0.46
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
18.8
5.2
1.9
0.64
0.22
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
6.9
2.5
0.84
0.29
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
8.9
3.2
1.1
0.37
0.15
9
-
-
-
-
-
11.1
4
1.36
0.46
0.19
10
-
-
-
-
-
13.4
4.9
1.65
0.55
0.32
 
For other type of pipes (new) multiply foregoing figures by factor given below
 
Sr no
Particulars
C
Multiplication factor
1
Galvanised iron
120
1.33
2
Uncoated cast iron
125
1.23
3
Coated cast iron, Wrought iron coated steel
130
1.07
4
Coated spun iron
135
1.07
5
Uncoated Asbestos cement and concoated steel pipes
140
1
6
Coated asbestos cement spun concrete or bitumem lines
145
0.94
7
Smooth pipes ( lead, brass, copper, stainless steel, glass, PVC
150
0.86
 
Table - 9 : Length of Straight Pipe in Meter giving Equivalent Resistance to Flow in Pipe Fittings [ IS : 2951 ( Part II ) - 1965 ] (Equivalent Length in Mtrs.)
 
Sr. No.
Pipe size (mm)
Elbow Bend
90 Bend
Standard Tee
Sluice valve
Foot or Reflux valve


(Ks=0.7)
(ks=0.12)
(Ks=0.4)
(Ks=0.4)
(Ks=3.5)
1
25
'0.536
'0.396
'0.704
'0.077
'2.04
2
40
'0.997
'0.569
'1.131
'0.142
'3.05
3
50
'1.296
'0.741
'1.704
'0.185
'3.96
4
65
'1.814
'1.037
'2.384
'0.259
'5.18
5
80
'2.241
'1.281
'2.946
'0.320
'6.10
6
100
'2.959
'1.691
'3.889
'0.422
'8.23
7
125
'4.037
'2.307
'5.306
'0.576
'10.0
8
150
'5.125
'2.928
'6.735
'0.732
'12.0
 
5.0       UNIT COST 

The unit cost of Drip Irrigation system depends upon the shape and size of command area, spacing and number of plants and their water requirement. The unit cost should include the cost of following main items.
  1. Mainline/Submain
  2. Laterals
  3. Drippers/micro-tubes
  4. Lateral connectors
  5. Straight connectors
  6. Filters (Screen or Gravel)
  7. Bends/end plugs, couplers, joint, tees
  8. Pressure gauge, water meters
  9. Water regulators
  10. Installation charges
The average unit costs of drip irrigation system for different crops are given in Table-10. This is for guidance only.
 
Table - 10 Unit Cost of Drip Irrigation System
 
Sr.No.
Crop
Spacing (m)
Cost (Rs/ha)
1
Coconut
8x8
23790/-
2
Sapota/Mango
10x10
17030/-
3
Oranges/Guava
6x6
28010/-
4
Pomegranate
4.5x2.7
32010/-
5
Grapes
2.7x1.8
54370/-
6
Banana/ Papaya
1.8x1.5
73010/-
7
Sugar Cane
[(0.75m+1.25m) x 0.15m] lateral spacing-2.25m
60440/-
8
Vegetables
0.6x0.45
103020/-
9
Mango
5x5
32060/-
10
Litchi
6x8
42000/-
 
The Estimated cost of drip irrigation system for Litchi cultivation on 1 ha plot is given in Annexure-I

6.0 Lending terms & Conditions
6.1 Margin Money : The beneficiaries may contribute towards down payment/margin money ranging from 5 to 25% depending upon their category, i.e., small and other farmers in accordance with the NABARD’s norms. Beneficiary’s own labour can also be taken as his contribution towards the margin money requirement.

6.2  Security  : As per RBI norms.

6.3 Interest Rate : The rate of interest to be charged to the ultimate borrowers would be decided by the financing banks as per the RBI guidelines from time to time. However, for working out the financial viability and bankability of the model project, the rate of interest is assumed as 12%. 

6.4 Repayment Period : Gestation period can be considered while fixing the repayment period. The repayment of interest shall commence from the end of the Gestation period onwards and would continue till the entire principal and interest thereon is repayed.
 
Appendix : II

MODEL FOR A SCHEME OF DRIP IRRIGATION 

This model scheme for drip irrigation system to avail loan assistance give details about estimation of water requirement of plantation crops, system design, HP of pumping unit, unit cost and financial viability of the investment. Let us assume that the beneficiary has an open well of 4m dia and 25 m depth fitted with 5 HP electric pump set. The area has a land slope of 0.5m/100m and the soil is clayey loam. The farmer proposes to install drip irrigation system for a new citrus plantation on a 1ha plot.

a. Design parameters 

Scheme formulation for installation of drip irrigation system against bank loan requires both technical and financial details. The important items that should be included in a scheme for drip irrigation system are given bellow :

b. Command area

A command area map giving systems layout is necessary to plan and design a drip irrigation system. It may not be necessary to have a detailed contour plan but it is helpful if a plan showing the highest and lowest points along with well location is given in the scheme. This enables proper design of main line and laterals to suit the spacing and number of plants.

The present scheme is prepared for application of drip irrigation on one hectare farm of Litchi.

c. Spacing and Plant Population of Litchi in one ha. 

The No of plants required for cultivation of 1 ha litchi with above spacing would be 100m x 100m /6 m x 8 m = 208 plants. However, the plant spacing adopted by earlier farmers was planting at 8x8m to 12x12m.

d. Water requirement for litchi plants.
Water requirement for litchi crop (WR) is a function of surface area covered by plants, evaporation rate and infiltration capacity of soil. The irrigation water requirement for each plant has been calculated for each plant and thereafter for the whole plot of 1 ha based on plant population for the different seasons. The maximum discharge required during any one of the three seasons is adopted for design purposes.

The daily water requirement for fully grown plants can be calculated as under.

WR A X B X C X D X .................Equation (1)

Where : WR = Water requirement (lpd /plant)

A = Open Pan evaporation (mm/day)
B = Pan factor (0.7)
C = Spacing of plant (m2)
D = Crop factor (factor depends on plant growth for fully grown plants = 1)
E = Wetted Area (0.3 for widely spaced crops )

The total water requirement of the farm plot would be WR x No.of Plants .

e. Estimation of Water Requirement
The irrigation water requirement is determined using IMD pan evaporation data. The average season wise pan evaporation data for the area is given below.
 
S.No.
Season
Days (Nos)
Total Pan (evaporation during the season (mm)
Avg. Daily Pan Evaporation (mm/day)
1
Kharif (15/6 to 15/10)
122
506.30
4.15
2
Rabi (16/10 to 15/4)
183
649.65
3.55
3
Summer (16/4 to 14/6)
60
408.00
6.45
 
The daily water requirement of plants using above equation has been worked out as under.
 
  Sr.No
Season
Evaporation (mm/day)
Water requirement



Lpd /plant
M3/ day/ha
1
Kharif
4.15
41.83
8.31
2
Rabi
3.55
35.78
7.44
3
Summer
6.45
65.07
13.53
 
Therefore, the drip irrigation system has to be designed for the maximum requirement of 65.07 litre /day/plant during the summer season and for this the water required would be 13.53 m3/ day/ha of plantation. If the average working hour of pump set is taken as 4 hours per day, the discharge required would be as below :

Pumping rate per hectare = 13.53 m3 /day/ha = 3.38 m3 /hr/ha = 0.94 LPs or say 1 LPs. As required discharge is only 13.53 m3 /day/ha, it can be pumped for one hour only from a well giving a discharge of 5-6 lps. This is also the normal well yield in the scheme area using a 3-5 HP pump set. For the estimated water requirement of 1 lps only, an arrangement to divert excess water to irrigate other crops would be provided, especially during Kharif and Rabi periods. Alternatively, a tank of 14 m3 capacity can be provided where necessary so that uninterrupted irrigation may continue even in areas where power shut down are frequent.

f. Emitters
Depending upon the type of emitter and discharge required their number can be estimated. For a pressure head of 4m and discharge at 17.5 litre /hour the number of emitters required are :

No. of emitters/plant = Rate of Pumping/hour/plant /Avg. discharge of one emitter
= 13.53/4 = 3.38 or say 4 emitters/ plant
The plot is square and of 1 ha. As such the mainline would be 100 m long and laterals would also be 100 m in length. As plant spacing is 6m x 8m, a total of 13 laterals would be required. Each lateral would serve approximately 16 plants and there would be 4 emitters per plant. Thus, the total number of emitters per lateral would be 16x4 = 64 nos.
As the total length of one lateral is 100m the emitters would be spaced at 1.5 m i.e. 100/64.

g. Main Line
The main line is designed to carry the maximum discharge required for total number of plants in the farm plot.
Maximum discharge required = No. of plants x peak discharge per plant
= 208x 13.53 = 2814 lph =0.78 or say 1 LPs

h. Friction Head loss in Pipes (m)
Total length = 100.0
Equivalent length of 13 straight connectors = 6.5
Equivalent length of tee, bends etc = 5.5.
Total =112.0 m.

The value of coefficients has been taken from tables given below. It would be seen from table 1 that for a discharge of 1 LPs through a pipe of say 40 mm diameter, the friction loss would be 2 m per 100 length or 2.2 m for 112 m equivalent length. Friction Losses for Flow of Water (m/100m) in smooth Pipes(c=140)
i. Discharge| Bore diameter(mm)
 
 (lps)
20
25
32
40
50
65
80
100
125
150
0.5
16.4
5.5
1.6
0.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
10
6
2
0.68
-
-
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
12.7
4.3
1.45
0.4
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
16
7.3
2.5
0.68
0.25
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
15.5
5.2
1.45
0.53
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
26.4
6.9
2.5
0.9
0.3
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
13.4
3.8
1.36
0.46
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
18.8
5.2
1.9
0.64
0.22
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
6.9
2.5
0.84
0.29
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
8.9
3.2
1.1
0.37
0.15
9
-
-
-
-
-
11.1
4
1.36
0.46
0.19
10
-
-
-
-
-
13.4
4.9
1.65
0.55
0.32
 
For other type of pipes (new) multiply foregoing figures by factor given below
Friction head loss = 2.2 x 0.88 = 1.94 or say 2.0
Conversion factor = (0.88)
As the proposed system uses multiple openings, the friction loss is taken as 1/3 of the total friction loss i.e. 2.0/3 i.e. 0.66 m. Thus, the loss in mains is within 1.0 m/100 m and a pipe of 40 mm diameter is ideal in the layout.

j. Laterals
A lateral is so selected that the pressure difference from the proximate end to the last emitter do not exceed 10% of the normal operating head which in the present case is 4m. The maximum permissible variation in friction loss in the pipe is 4x10/100 = 0.4 m for a lateral of 100 m length. The land slope is 0.5 m/ 100m. Thus the total friction loss allowable is 0.4 + 0.5 = 0.9 m.
In addition to 100 m length of laterals there is additional loss due to connectors. This is generally taken as 0.1 to 1m (on an average 0.5) of the equivalent length of an emitter. The equivalent length of 64 emitters would thus be 64x0.5 = 32 m. Thus, total equivalent length for calculation of friction loss in laterals would be 132 m (100+32). The total flow in laterals is 256 lph i.e. 4 x 4 x16. It may be seen from Table No 4 that for 200 LPs flow the friction loss in 13.9 m length would be 2.25 m. It is a general practice that friction losses are taken at 1/3 of the total equivalent length of pipes with multiple emitter/connections. Thus, the friction loss works out to 1/3 x 2.25 = 0.75 m which is within the maximum permissible limit of 0.9 m. Therefore, 14 mm (outer dia) lateral pipe of 100 m length is suggested in this scheme.
The friction loss in micro tubes need not be considered as a minimum of 4m head is prescribed which includes friction loss.
Friction Head Loss in M per 100 m. Pipe Length
 
 Flow
Inside diameter (mm)

9.2
11.7
12.7
13.9
15.8
18.0
19.0
(lph)
Head loss in m per 100 m length of pipe
200
10.2
5.2
2.5
1.7
0.8
0.4
0.3
400
39.0
18.0
8.6
5.7
2.7
1.6
1.1
600
--
39.0
18.0
13.0
5.9
3.2
2.5
800
--
--
30.0
21.0
10.0
5.5
4.1
1,000
--
--
45.0
30.0
16
8.3
6.2
1,200
--
--
--
42.0
21.0
11.0
8.8
1,400
--
--
--
56.0
28.0
16.0
11.0
1,600
--
--
--
--
36.0
20.0
15.0
1,800
--
--
--
--
45.0
25
19.0
2,000
--
--
--
--
54.0
30.0
23.0
 
k. HP of Pump set
The HP of pump set required is based upon design discharge and total operating head. The total head is the sum of total static head and friction losses in the system.
(i) Static Head.The total static head is the sum total of the following (m).
 
Depth to water (bgl)
16 m (assumed)
Draw down
3 m (assumed)
Height of Delivery pipe (agl)
1 m
Friction loss in pipes, bends, foot valves etc.
2.25m
Total
22.25 m
 
(ii) The friction loss in the drip unit as under (m)
 
Friction loss in main pipe
2.2 m
Friction loss in laterals
0.75 m
Minimum head required over emitters
4.0 m
Total
6.95 m
 
Total Head = Static Head + Friction head loss = 22.25 + 6.95 = 29.20 m or say 30 m
The required HP of the pumpset has been calculated as per the following formula.

Hp of pump set = Q x H/ 75 x e
Where Q = discharge (lps)
H = Head (m)
e = Pumping efficiency (o.6)
HP = 1x30 /75x.6 = 0.66 or say 1 HP.
 
Appendix - III
CHECK LIST
MINOR IRRIGATION - DRIP IRRIGATION
(To be completed by the Executive/Officer of the bank forwarding the scheme)
NOTE : Tick (/ ) across the line to signify that the relevant information has been furnished in the scheme.
 
GENERAL
  • Specifications of the scheme area
  • Nature and objective proposed development
  • Name(s) of the financing bank(s) / branch(s)
  • Approval of the schemes by the competent authority, including State Government in the case of SLDB. Coverage of the loans under the Guarantee Schemes of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation
  • Status of beneficiaries (individuals/partnership firms/company/Corporation/Co-operative Society) and the coverage of borrowers in weaker sections like small (as per norms given by National Bank) or marginal farmers/SC/ST, etc.
  • Land-use pattern, source-wise irrigated area, present cropping pattern, yield and income per acre, land holding distribution, land tenure system etc. in scheme area
  • Capability/experience of the persons/institutions implementing the scheme
  • TECHNICAL ASPECTS
  • Command area map with levels
  • Type of soil
  • IMD Normal Annual Rainfall
  • IMD Monthly Evaporation
  • Proposed cropping pattern with plant spacing and number of plants per hectare for a modal farm
  • Peak water requirements per plant/day and per plant/season
  • Designed discharge and water availability in hours per day
  • Existing pumping equipment
i. Range of HP
ii. Whether electric/diesel
  • Water availability
i. Geology of the area
ii. Category of block
iii. Chemical quality of water
iv. Design of well (dia/Depth)
v. Well discharge
  • Design of Drip system for a model
i. Main line
ii. Sub main
iii. Laterals
iv. Emitters/Micro tubes
v. Lateral/Straight connectors
vi. Filters/screens
vii. Fertilizer unit
viii. Bends/end plugs, joints etc.
ix. Pressure gauge, water m
x. Water regulators
xi. Item-wise break-up of unit cost
xii. Comments on technical feasibility of the project
  • FINANCIAL ASPECTS
  • Lending terms : rate of interest, grace period, repayment period, down payment, nature of security, availability of Government guarantee for bank loan/refinance (if necessary), source and extent of availability of subsidy etc.
  • Year-wise physical and financial programme, bank loan and refinance requirement
  • Income "without project and "with project" with reference to the representative of the holdings in the scheme area and the estimate of incremental income
  • Comments on the financial viability of the project along with cash flow, BC Ration, net present worth, financial rate of return (IRR) etc.
  • Comments on the financial position of the borrowers/implementing agency. In the case of partnership firms/companies/Corporation or Society an analysis of their financial position, debt-equity ratio and profitability along with copies of audited financial statements for the last three years.
  • INFRA STRUCTURAL FACILITIES
  • Sources of availability of capital assets/drip irrigation system, the approximate distance and arrangements for their maintenance/servicing
  • Arrangements for availability of raw-material, improved seeds/fertilizers, pesticides, etc., for agriculture
  • Agencies providing crop loans/maintenance expenses to the beneficiaries and the adequacy of the arrangements.
  • Availability of technical staff for implementation of the scheme with the bank/implementing authority.
  • Details of technical guidance, government support/extension service available and whether budgetary provision has been made for the same.
  • Supervision and monitoring arrangements available with the financing institution.
  • Availability of power and diesel.
Signature and Designation of the Bank Officer
 


No comments: